MISFITS Views

Jurassic Park III Review
by Tim Wick

I have a tough time remaining objective about this movie.

On the one hand, you have the fact that this film is so far advanced from every other action/adventure film released this summer (heck, this whole YEAR) that it cries out for five beakers in simple gratitude.

On the other hand, I wasn't really blown away by the film either. I'm not really sure if the reason is shortcomings in the film or the fact that I really didn't feel like I was watching anything new.

In my review of The Score, I defended a formulaic heist movie by pointing out it only had to do a few things to be successful. The same rules apply to a Jurassic Park movie. The movie followed all the rules so I should just like it and be done with it.

But....

Well....

The thing is that this time around, "bigger" seems to be more important than "scarier." Case in point: the major enemy in this picture is the Spinosaurus, a carnivore much larger than a plain old T-Rex. In an early sequence, we get to see just how much of a bad ass this mega-meat eater is. Why, then, was he never as scary as that T-Rex was in the original Jurassic park lo those many years ago?

Part of it is familiarity. Jurassic Park already did the great big meat eater is about to have you for lunch thing. We've seen it. We know that a few characters are red shirts and marked for death and others are at the very least sticking around for one more scene so there will be somebody for the next dinosaur to kill. That's fine. That's what the movie is about, but I was left with a sort of ho hum feel about the whole thing. I didn't really get too wrapped up in the characters I figured on being dino lunch.

Another part is that the dinosaur reveals in this picture aren't as downright scary as in the original. I'm not talking Lost World here - that film doesn't deserve to enter into the debate. With Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, The Lost World stands as the best argument against Steven Spielberg doing sequels.

But think about the reveal of the T-Rex in Jurassic Park. We didn't even see it at first. At first, we just saw the ripple of water in a cup. So much was spoken about that mass of the creature who created that reaction and we'd not even seen it yet. Our first view of the Spinosaurus is as he leaps out of the jungle and chomps someone. The suspense is lost. We aren't breathlessly waiting for the beast. There was a jump in the audience, but nothing compared to the jump in the original when the goats tail landed on the truck. Again, we hadn't even seen the T-Rex yet, but we sure had a good idea what he could do.

In all fairness, that is not the purpose here. Velociraptors can never be spookier than they were in the original film. We didn't really know what they were back then. We thought that the T-Rex was the top of the Dino food chain and the most dangerous threat to our band of bait. Turned out that the dinosaurs who are really dangerous are the ones who can open doors and are small enough to pass through them.

Too late to do that in Jurassic Park III. Instead, we get Pteranadons because that way we need to be looking over our heads as well as around every tree.

I'm not going to argue about the coolness of Pteranadons because they are inherently cool. Flying dinosaurs add an element of danger that hadn't been there before. Of course, they are also still locked in a cage and are something less than a perfect threat. Instead, they are an episode to be survived (by most) and then left behind. We do have a moment where we think it will be different, but - alas - that moment is a mere red herring.

This is not a bad movie. Heck, it's even a pretty good movie. I can't help but wonder if my opinion of the film is colored more by the fact I can see most of the ways in which the first film is so superior to this one. Were this movie Jurassic Park I, would I like it more? I think I probably would. The characters are sketches, but should be nothing more. The action sequences are certainly better than what has been presented so far this year. The dinosaurs are big and cool and having people for lunch.

The only reason I want more from a dinosaur movie is because of the dinosaur movie this film is derived from. That is, I'm sure, extremely unfair of me.

I want the rippling water glass. I want the clever quips of Malcom. So what I need to do is go out and buy the DVD for the original. But I also need to tell you that if you enjoy action films and you like your dinosaurs, you should definitely see this movie. You don't really have any better action film to see. Trust me, I've been looking.

Read another review of Jurassic Park III

 

Views Home Page

America's Sweethearts Review: Defending romantic comedies. (07/24/2001)

The Score Review (07/23/2001)

Jurassic Park III Review: More dinosaurs. What did you expect? (07/19/2001)

Daughter of the Forest Review: First book in a celtic fantasy trilogy (07/17/2001)

Legally Blond Review: Clearly a fantasy movie. (07/17/2001)

amazon.com

iGive

Home




Jurassic Park III
* * * +
Three and a half Beakers
(out of five)

Based on his belief that people coming to this site give a rip about his opinion, you have probably guessed that Tim Wick has a pretty big ego. Despite having no experience as a critic, he insists on writing these boorish reviews of movies in a vain attempt to feel more important. Since it allows us to put up new material on the site and keep you all coming back for more, we go ahead and humor him.

We don't know anything about Tim's past. We assume that he just walked out of the west like Cain in Kung Fu, but we don't really care. He is a member of the board of directors for MISFITS and runs the read the book/see the movie club.

Or so he claims...

You can also read Tim's America's Sweethearts review.

Search This Site


Copyright © 2001 MISFITS. e-mail:info@misfit.org
url: http://www.misfit.org
1437 Marshall Avenue, Suite 203
St. Paul, MN 55104