MISFITS Views

The Score Review
by Tim Wick

Just looking at the list of names connected with this film, you must at least HOPE it will be good. Edward Norton, Robert DeNiro, Marlon Brando and Angela Basset are the leads directed by Frank Oz (who has come a long way since directing The Muppets Take Manhattan). Even a poor script is likely to be acted well given the names above.

Fortunately, the script - though derivative and ultimately not terribly original - is clever and tight and engaging. The acting, of course, is top notch and the result is an enjoyable film.

Make no mistake - this is a by the numbers heist film that takes no new risks and certainly breaks no new ground. To use that as an argument against it is both unfair and unrealistic.

Audiences like heist films. Hollywood would have stopped making them years ago if there wasn't any demand for them. I think we all dream about being able to make that "one big score" that would mean we would be set for the rest of our lives. It's easy to imagine yourself ripping off rich people. Seriously, would Bill Gates care if I took something from his house worth a measly couple million dollars? I'd be set for life and he could buy a new one. Nobody got hurt and now there are two people with a lot of money instead of just one.

So the first trick of a good heist film is to make sure that the audience likes the guy who is doing the stealing and wants him to get the goods. DeNiro's Nick is just about the perfect character with this in mind. Nick has been cracking safes for the last twenty five years. He has a nice apartment and runs a jazz club, but he's just a working class guy who pays for all the things he enjoys through a job you don't exactly find in the want ads. Years of slowly acquiring wealth at the risk of his freedom have made Nick very weary. He's ready to quit. But we know that anyone like Nick needs one last score before he's done. A heist movie demands it.

We want the score to work out for Nick. He's got a girlfriend (Bassett) he's ready to settle down with, a good business that just needs to have the mortgage paid off and a life that is a lot more comfortable than a prison cell. One more score - a big one - and he's done.

But to make the score, he's going to have to work with Jack (Norton), a guy on the end of the heist business that Jack was twenty five years ago. Jack is cocky, clever and just a bit too reckless. He makes Nick uncomfortable. He makes us uncomfortable because we aren't sure if he's the weak link in the whole plan or stronger than Nick because he is more willing to take chances. Norton is an accomplished actor who can say a great deal without ever opening his mouth.

That skill is extremely important during the latter 45 minutes of the film, which is the heist itself. I hope nobody thinks it's a spoiler that after the set up, they actually try to commit the robbery. Given the sparse dialogue in this sequence, it's imperative the actors are capable of conveying their emotions without words or in urgent whispers.

Aside from liking the main character (which we do), the film has to generate good tension where the heist itself is concerned. If we are absolutely certain it will all work out, we will be shifting impatiently in our seats until the thing is over. Oz and editor Richard Pearson keep things tight and tense throughout, revealing just enough to let you know what should be worrying you at specific moments in time. We know just enough to be uncertain what each character is up to - it's an extremely effective sequence.

If I have any significant gripe, it is only that the film ended about two short scenes after it needed to. The scenes added nothing as they were implied by what had come before. Big films like this often err in the same manner - spelling something out because they assume the audience couldn't go there on their own. That, however, is a nitpicky detail that did not detract from my enjoyment of the film, it's just a post note to show that I am capable of recognizing flaws in the movie since I'm not actually going to give it five beakers.

So, to sum it up - the big things a Heist movie has to do is make you care about the people doing the job and make the job itself engaging. The score delivers on both accounts and contains some fine acting as a bonus (I haven't even mentioned Marlon Brando - bad oversight but it's too late now). As the lackluster summer of '01 plods on, this film is something of an oases.

 

Views Home Page

Jurassic Park III Review: More dinosaurs. What did you expect? (07/19/2001)

Daughter of the Forest Review: First book in a celtic fantasy trilogy (07/17/2001)

Legally Blond Review: Clearly a fantasy movie. (07/17/2001)

Kiss of the Dragon Review: Jet Li does his best to have a mainstream US action film. (07/16/2001)

Final Fantasy Review: How is the animation? How is the story? Does it work? (07/12/2001)

amazon.com

iGive

Home




The Score
* * * *
Four Beakers
(out of five)

Based on his belief that people coming to this site give a rip about his opinion, you have probably guessed that Tim Wick has a pretty big ego. Despite having no experience as a critic, he insists on writing these boorish reviews of movies in a vain attempt to feel more important. Since it allows us to put up new material on the site and keep you all coming back for more, we go ahead and humor him.

We don't know anything about Tim's past. We assume that he just walked out of the west like Cain in Kung Fu, but we don't really care. He is a member of the board of directors for MISFITS and runs the read the book/see the movie club.

Or so he claims...

You can also read Tim's Legally Blond review.

Search This Site


Copyright © 2001 MISFITS. e-mail:info@misfit.org
url: http://www.misfit.org
1437 Marshall Avenue, Suite 203
St. Paul, MN 55104