MISFITS Views

Mummy Returns Review
by Ishmael Williams

Okay, let's get right to it: I liked this one.

I thought it was a ride, and a good one to boot. Returning are Brendan Fraser and Rachel Wiesz, reprising their roles from the first film, only now they are married, and apparently happily so. Rounding out the good guy returns are John Hannah, who plays brother to the Wiesz character, and Oded Fehr, who plays a desert nomad dedicated to keeping the mummy in his tomb. Opposing them we have the return of Arnold Vosloo as Im-Ho-Tep, the mummy himself, and Patricia Velasquez as Anck-Su-Namun, his love.

Now reincarnated, Anck-Su-Namun is seeking to revive her love, Im-Ho-Tep, for your basic world domination and subjugation plot. For a variety of fairly entertaining reasons, it's up to Brendan Fraser and Rachel Wiesz to stop them. One thing I particularly love are the references to the first time these four faced each other. Im-Ho-Tep remembers both hero and heroine, and bears a grudge.

I thought it a good action flick, with some fairly suspenseful moments. There are times when the CGI effects overshadow the actors a bit. But Fraser rises above much of that with his seeming knock-off of Indiana Jones, and Rachel Wiesz' character, Evie O'Connel, has developed nicely in the seemingly 10 years since we saw them last. She's even more feisty and daring than in her previous incarnation. Her brother has not changed much, and neither has the desert nomad. As for Fraser, his O'Connell character seems much the same as well, but a bit more subdued and tamed. I doubt that he was originally all that wild to begin with, but here he appears even more - domesticated.

The lad who plays their son does so with great glee, and looks like he's having as much fun as the adults. Vosloo successfully recreates all of the malevolent charm and menace as he displayed in the original.

It's hard to write about this movie without giving things away. It's not academy award material, almost no adventure flick is. It goes a little beyond the original, and I saw it as different film, and a continuation of the story and the conflict. There were new elements that added new motivations, and some old motivations that still work.

I do have a quibble with two things brought out in this movie about two of the characters. To me, they seemed unnecessary, and there were, in my opinion, better ways of handling the plot elements these represented.

Still, I'd see it again, at full evening movie price, which is probably the highest compliment one can pay any film. I'm wondering if there will be a part 3... ?

Check out our other Mummy Returns Review.

 

Views Home Page

Douglas Adams Tribute: Tributes to the author of The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. (05/13/2001)

The Mummy Returns Review: Back to Egypt! (05/07/2001)

Clerks: The Animated Series Uncensored Review: Snootchie Bootchies (05/03/2001)

Bridget Jones's Diary Review: Renee Zellweger as a Brit. (04/25/2001)

The Dreaming Jewels Reviewed: More classic SF reviewed. (04/25/2001)

amazon.com

iGive

Home



The Mummy Returns
* * *
Three Beakers
(out of five)

Ishmael I. Williams is a fan of both movies and television, and doesn't get to see as much as he'd like in any given year. Still, what he does get to see he enjoys writing about, and hope people will stop by from time to time to see what he has to say. He also thinks he's going to be a pretty good foil for Tim Wick, fellow board member and with whom he often disagrees on a film (ask Tim and Ish about Wild Wild West sometime).

He previously wrote about Bewitched

Search This Site


Copyright © 2001 MISFITS. e-mail:info@misfit.org
url: http://www.misfit.org
1437 Marshall Avenue, Suite 203
St. Paul, MN 55104