MISFITS Views

Pay It Forward Review
by Tim Wick

Remember the old commercial for shampoo? You tell two friends and they tell two friends and so on and so on and so on....?

If you don't it's probably better for you. To tell the truth, I'm not 100% confident they were trying to sell shampoo. I was just using the commercial to illustrate the central premise of Pay it Forward. If you don't know already (having somehow avoided every ad that has been produced for this film), then perhaps you should stop reading so you can enjoy the film unfettered by previous knowledge of what Pay it Forward means.

For the rest of you, I'm not writing a spoiler here. The movie is borrowing from a shampoo commercial and a little bit of the Amway plan as it asks us to believe that one 11 year old boy can change the world by teaching people to be nice to each other.

It's a great thought and I was pulling for it. I mean, I admired Rodney King for tearfully asking if we couldn't just "all get along". I watch the unrest in the Middle East wondering why so many seemingly reasonable people are incapable of settling an argument they didn't even start without shooting at each other. What if we all just did something nice for someone else with the only price being that they have to do something nice for someone in return? Turn off your reality check for a minute and enjoy the possibilities.

The other reason I was pulling for this movie was the stars. Between the three leads we had four Oscar Nominations and three wins. I mean, you put a Pauly Shore film out there that co-stars Helen Hunt, Haley Joel Osmont and Kevin Spacey and I'm there. I'd probably wait for a second run on that movie.

But the point is you have a touching premise and a great cast and you have a movie with a ton of potential.

And it lives up to most of it's potential. I'd like to say all, but there are just a few things that prevented this film from reaching greatness for me.

Now I am moving into MAJOR SPOILER territorry here. I'm going to give a little space for those of you who don't want to know major plot elements. If you don't want to read further 'til you've seen the film, I don't blame you. Basic gist - the film is pretty good but not great. Check back after you've seen the film.


.
.
.
.
.
.
SPOILER COMING
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

The biggest problem with this film was, in my opinion, the ending. It didn't fit the film and there was no particular reason for it to have happened. The closing scene was very emotional - I don't deny that I misted up - but it wasn't really "right". Rather than making the film stronger, it was weakened.

A death, while emotional, has a numbing effect when it does not drive the film forward. A needless death in the last five minutes of the film just so one can create an overly emotional Field of Dreams like finale is simply annnoying.

In a file where I really enjoyed the acting of the three leads, I was let down by the script. The entire film focused on the central characters when there was a host of periphery characters who were no less interesting and who easily could have been given three or four more minutes of screen time.

In particular, I'm thinking of a heroin addict named Jerrry who is the first person Haley's character Trevor tries to help. Jerry tries to get himself straight, but he falls off the wagon. We assume that is it for him, but later we see him talk a woman out of jumping off a bridge. We never see him or the woman again. I wanted to see a little about where their story went and was disappointed when I was not allowed that glimpse.

Of course, the movie is really trying to focus on how Trevor's idea can work on a grand and a small scale. On the one hand, we see a reporter who become the benefactor of Trevor's idea despite living in a different state. On the other hand, we watch as he tries to use his idea to help his mother (Helen Hunt) and the teacher who gave him the inspiration in the first place (Kevin Spacey).

I think the movie got so bogged down in focusing on the little picture (the relationship between Hunt and Spacey) that it loses the fascinating big picture (the slow spread of Trevor's idea across the country). As a result, neither story works as well as it could.

Still, this movie is an entertaining dose of sweetness in a world that can use all the sweetness it can get. Without the ending, I would have no problem giving this film four beakers. The ending bumps it down to a three and a half.

 

Views Home Page

Best In Show Review: Going to the dogs...(10/24/2000)

MISFITS at Icon: Have a potato! (10/17/2000)

Meet The Parents Review: Everyone's greatest fear (10/10/2000)

Remember the Titans Review: Are you ready for some football? (10/06/2000)

Nurse Betty: Movie Review (09/28/2000)

amazon.com

iGive

Home



Pay It Forward
* * * +
Three and a Half Beakers
(out of five)

Based on his belief that people coming to this site give a rip about his opinion, you have probably guessed that Tim Wick has a pretty big ego. Despite having no experience as a critic, he insists on writing these boorish reviews of movies in a vain attempt to feel more important. Since it allows us to put up new material on the site and keep you all coming back for more, we go ahead and humor him.

We don't know anything about Tim's past. We assume that he just walked out of the west like Cain in Kung Fu, but we don't really care. He is a member of the board of directors for MISFITS and runs the read the book/see the movie club.

Or so he claims...

You can also read Tim's thoughts on Best In Show .


Search This Site

Copyright © 2000 MISFITS. e-mail:info@misfit.org
url: http://www.misfit.org
1437 Marshall Avenue, Suite 203
St. Paul, MN 55104