But I've already seen the Movie by Tim Wick
Howdy to everyone that reads my reviews! I know that my intrepid fans (if I
can be so presumptuous as to call the twenty of you fans) have wondered why
there have been no reviews from me on the site in a couple of weeks. I
mean, with Gladiator and Battlefield Earth out, you would have expected
me to weigh in with my unimportant views on these films. Thing is....I
haven't seen them.
I hang my head in shame, but I confess that I've been on vacation and was so
busy having a good time that I flat didn't get to the theatre (we had
planned to do so, but things got in the way - like other stuff we wanted to
do more). So I haven't seen Gladiator yet. I will file my much belated
review once I actually get to the film (probably before it's out of the
theatres). Instead, I'd like to talk about movies I HAVE seen.
Actually, I don't want to talk about the movies, I want to talk about their
trailers. Is anyone besides me sick of trailers where the entire film is
given away in 60 seconds? You know the trailers I mean. How about the
Mission to Mars trailer that showed you the end of the film? Or the
Snake Eyes trailer that told you who the killer was? I have probably
missed some great films because their trailer left me with no desire to see
the movie.
What makes a trailer great and what makes it suck? I have my own opinions,
but let's look a the basics - a good trailer makes you want to see the
movie. A great trailer makes you NEED to see the movie.
In recent memory, I can't think of a better trailer than the one for The
Matrix (Yeah, I know - you are all sick of me talking about how great this
film is - get over it). Sadly, the actual trailer is not available on the
DVD (a major oversight), but it is often shown before movies at MISFITS
movie nights. Watch it sometime if you can and you will understand what I
mean. The trailer is a stream of great images plus a few catch phrases
("Welcome to the real world", "What is the Matrix?", etc.).
Unless you are
some kind of telepath, you wouldn't have the slightest clue what the movie
was about, but you sure as hell knew it LOOKED COOL!!!!!
Now, let's consider the stinky trailer currently out for Gone in Sixty
Seconds (which I will see because I love Nicholas Cage - even in shlock
like this). The first few seconds of this trailer are fantastic. A
narrator tells you how long it took you to buy your ticket, popcorn and find
your seat. Then she tells you it took the characters only 60 seconds to
steal your car. A series of quick flashes from action to action follow and
then the Buena Vista logo (a lightning bolt hitting a tree) flashes up. If
the trailer ended there, it would be great. Instead, it goes on for a
nearly interminable amount of time. We learn that instead of being a film
about people stealing cars, it is apparently a film about people crashing
cars and making out in them. All interest in the film that was generated in
the first fifteen seconds is drained to nothing by the end of the preview.
I don' t think the trailer gives away the ending, but who cares?
My understanding (and this is only an understanding, not verified fact) is
that movie makers rarely make their own trailers. Instead they contract to
a third party to create the trailers. These companies that produce trailers
must be stopped. They haven't got the slightest idea that some of us like
to be surprised by what happens in the movie. Some of us (like me) remember
scenes from trailers and can predict that the film isn't over because a
certain scene has not been shown yet.
Take The Shawshank Redemption. Despite fine filmmaking, I knew that Andy
was not going to kill himself as he sat alone in his cell with a length of
rope. Why? Because I had seen the preview that included a shot of Andy
standing in a stream with his arms outstretched and I hadn't seen that shot
yet. Sure enough it happened about five minutes later. That is unfair. I
wanted to be wondering what was really going to happen along with everyone
else in the theatre. I could be the exception here, but that doesn't make
it any less frustrating.
Then you have the completely horrible trailer for Snake Eyes that makes it
look like a movie to avoid. Why watch a whodunnit when you already know who
did it?
Another horrible trailer was the one for The Iron Giant. Is anybody from
Warner Brothers reading this? I'm going to be clear here. If - you -
wanted - people - to - watch - the - Iron - Giant - you - should - not -
have - shown - the - giant - in - the - trailer!!!! Mystery is what gets
butts into seats! You gave us everything except the tear jerker ending for
god's sake! A great movie can be shot down by a crummy trailer. Such was
the case with The Iron Giant.
Somewhere in the middle are trailers for films like The Sixth Sense. If
the film was not so strong, the trailer would have bothered me. The film is
better if you don't know from the opening credits that the kid sees dead
people. If you don't know that at first, he just seems disturbed. Later,
when you start seeing what he sees, you realize he is sane, but being pushed
to the brink of madness by what he is seeing. The trailer prevents you from
having that experience, but instead it got butts into the seats because more
people will watch a ghost story than will watch a movie about a child
psychologist. Tough call. The trailer gave too much away, but made people
want to see the film.
I know people who will do just about anything to miss a trailer. They will
plug their ears, close their eyes and hum loudly because they want to know
NOTHING at all about the film. I'm fine with knowing a little. I want a
flavor of what the picture is about. If it's a comedy, I'd like a joke or
two (but not every funny line in the picture). If it's bad, I'm hoping the
trailer will tell me that (which explains why you haven't seen a review of
Viva Rock Vegas either).
I just wish that the people who make trailers would realize that some of us
actually remember them. Those of us who do would like the people creating
trailers to remember a few simple rules:
- Don't include anything from the last 15 - 20 minutes of the film.
That's payoff territory and you stand the chance of ruining it for your
audience.
- Shorter is better. I am more jazzed for a movie that I've seen 15
seconds of than I ever will be for a movie I've seen two minutes of.
- Find a different voice over guy. I'm serious. That bass, earnest
sounding guy is fine for Mission Impossible, but he doesn't quite fit with
Return to Me. Have any of you considered using a female for a voice over
once in a while? I know, they used one for Gone in Sixty Seconds, but
that doesn't count.
- If we are supposed to spend part of the movie figuring out who the
killer is - DON'T GIVE IT AWAY IN THE TRAILER!!!!!
- Stop using music from the Dave soundtrack. I love the movie, but
enough is enough.
- Nothing you can do will convince us that a movie starring Pauly Shore is
funny. Shorter is better. Give the movie title and then say "Starring
Pauly Shore". That's all most of us need to know.
- Have you considered reading the script before you cut these things? I
mean I know you probably don't get a final cut of the film, but you could
probably find a script somewhere. That might clue you in to scenes you might
not want to use....
- Don't use every good joke in the movie for the trailer. If they are
bad, no-one will go see your comedy because they figure they have already
seen the funniest parts.
- I don't care how special a movie is, the word "special" should be banned
from trailer scripts. This is true of TV ads as well. Can anybody tell me
the last time Seventh Heaven wasn't "special"?
- Include stuff that ISN'T in the movie. That's the best way to baffle
those of us that remember trailers. We'll spend the next several days
complaining about the fact that half the trailer wasn't in the film. Serves
us right.
My point here (if I ever had one) is that a trailer can be fantastic. I
love the trailer for The Matrix every bit as much as I love the film. I
feel the same way about the trailer for Buckaroo Banzai. Those trailers
got me into the theatre. I haven't even rented Snake Eyes. See the
difference?
|
|
|
Based on his belief that people coming to this site give a rip about his
opinion, you have probably guessed that Tim Wick has a pretty big ego.
Despite having no experience as a critic, he insists on writing these boorish
reviews of movies in a vain attempt to feel more important. Since it allows
us to put up new material on the site and keep you all coming back for more,
we go ahead and humor him.
We don't know anything about Tim's past. We assume that he just walked out
of the west like Cain in Kung Fu, but we don't really care. He is a member
of the board of directors for MISFITS and runs the read the book/see the
movie club.
Or so he claims...
You can also read Tim's
Frequency Review
|
Search This Site
|